<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James R J Constable &#187; lighttpd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesconstable.co.uk/tag/lighttpd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesconstable.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hosting Sites with Heavy Traffic on Amazon EC2</title>
		<link>http://jamesconstable.co.uk/web-development/hosting-sites-with-heavy-traffic-on-amazon-ec2/</link>
		<comments>http://jamesconstable.co.uk/web-development/hosting-sites-with-heavy-traffic-on-amazon-ec2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon ec2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ec2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighttpd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesconstable.co.uk/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned previously that I&#8217;d been looking at Amazon EC2 as a solution to host a site that underwent heavy bursts of traffic for only a couple of hours a week. The expected traffic bursts were 10-15k visitors in a 2 hour period and unfortunately a small EC2 instance just wasn&#8217;t enough. The next trial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned previously that I&#8217;d been looking at Amazon EC2 as a solution to<a href="http://jamesconstable.co.uk/web-development/more-on-hosting-with-amazon-ec2/" > host a site that underwent heavy bursts of traffic</a> for only a couple of hours a week.  The expected traffic bursts were 10-15k visitors in a 2 hour period and unfortunately a small EC2 instance just wasn&#8217;t enough.  The next trial was with a large EC2 instance, with Apache tweaked to allow more simultaneous connections.  Results went better than first time but I ended up having to bounce Apache a couple of times during the time frame to get it back up and running.</p>
<p>So fast forward to this week and it was time to try again.  This time I went with an Extra Large instance running a stock 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04 and Lighttpd instead of Apache.  And this time there were no problems.  For the full 2 hours the site remained up and responsive, and because I could time the instance to come up just before the additional cost was negligible.</p>
<p>To give you an idea of the kind of traffic it had to deal with, the site took in just over 25,000 unique visitors in a 2 hour time frame.  Glad to get the problem solved and now I know what to do next time I need some heavy traffic handled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamesconstable.co.uk/web-development/hosting-sites-with-heavy-traffic-on-amazon-ec2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
